A timely example of Senate versus House.
Glenn Thrush
February 11, 2009
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid played a little high-stakes chicken with each other at the tail end of Wednesday’s shotgun stimulus talks.
It’s not clear who won – or who blinked.
According to a half dozen Congressional aides and members, Reid went before the cameras Wednesday to announce a stimulus deal before Pelosi had agreed on all the details of school construction financing.
“It’s ruffled feathers, big time,” said a House Democrat speaking on condition of anonymity. “The speaker went through the roof.”
Added one House Democratic aide: “He tried to roll her and she knew it.”
A few minutes after Reid announced the deal, Senate Appropriations Chairman Daniel Inouye (D-Hawaii) convened a public meeting of the House-Senate conference committee.
It was supposed to be a glorified photo op. But there were no House Democrats in the room – and Inouye hastily announced the meeting would be scrapped pending a Pelosi “briefing” of members on the details.
The problem, according to people familiar with the situation, was that Pelosi hadn’t completely signed off on the Senate’s approach to restoring some of the $21 billion in school construction funding. House Democrats are pushing to have school-repair funding listed as a recurring expense; Senate Republicans want such an allocation to be a one-time-only deal.
The approach adopted by the Senate still infuriates many members of her caucus, and Pelosi had yet to fully make her case to dissenters, a source told Politico.
The result: Pelosi summoned Reid to her office – her turf – to hash out unspecified modifications to the package prior to a 5:15 re-convening of the conference committee.
People close to Pelosi painted a different picture – one that portrays Reid as the one being rolled. Pelosi, they say, strategically permitted Reid to make his announcement – and then held up her approval to extract a slightly better deal.
Contradicting other sources who said that Pelosi had been blindsided, a House Democratic aide, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said that Reid had placed a “head’s up” phone call to Pelosi before announcing the deal.
A Senate aide concurred, saying that Pelosi "wasn't blindsided" and "didn't say no" when Reid announced he was going public. The staffer added that Pelosi spent much of the day trying -- unsuccessfully -- to convince the three Senate Republicans to make changes.
Pelosi told reporters late Wednesday that she had some success selling the Senate on unspecified legislative language "that spoke to the purpose of school construction."
Whatever the real story, Pelosi’s members were more than a little bewildered and headed into Wednesday’s night’s negotiation singing their Kumbayas through gritted teeth.
“[Senate Democrats] don’t know everything that’s in the bill,” said a laughing Charles Rangel (D-N.Y.), chairman of the Ways and Committee. “So I’m afraid to go to that damned conference.”
Even Senate Democrats seemed a little flummoxed. Ben Nelson (D-Neb.), briefing reporters after the Reid presser, stopped short of actually saying he was 100 percent sure a deal had been cut.
"There was general agreement," he said. "It doesn't mean everything is locked in yet. But if we didn't have an agreement, then there wouldn't have been a news conference."
This blog serves my Congress course (Claremont McKenna College Government 101) for the spring of 2024.
ABOUT THIS BLOG
I shall post videos, graphs, news stories, and other material there. We shall use some of this material in class, and you may review the rest at your convenience. You will all receive invitations to post to the blog. (Please let me know if you do not get such an invitation.) I encourage you to use the blog in these ways:
There are only two major limitations: no coarse language, and no derogatory comments about people at the Claremont Colleges.
To post questions or comments about the readings before we discuss them in class;
To follow up on class discussions with additional comments or questions.
To post relevant news items or videos.
There are only two major limitations: no coarse language, and no derogatory comments about people at the Claremont Colleges.
Search This Blog
Links
Wednesday, February 11, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Links
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(134)
-
▼
February
(48)
- This calls for a trip to the DMV ...
- A new health care plan?
- Word on the Tweet
- The Myth of the Filibuster
- Committees
- House vs. Senate
- In the Spirit of our Last Essay
- And the recount continues...
- With Words We Govern
- RNC chair plans 'off the hook' campaign, tells cri...
- More Burris - It's not looking good for him
- Congress could have used this:
- "How Congress Actually Works"
- The House Minority Leader Reacts to the Stimulus
- Presidential Rankings
- What is in the stimulus?
- Congressional approval allegedly jumps
- Burris Update
- New DSCC Chair Projects 2010 Success
- What constitutes a successful legislative fight as...
- Hill Style and Home Style
- The Best They Could Do
- No title
- There must be somthing in the water in Illinois...
- Eric Cantor and Newt Gingrich
- Number 59
- Did Reid Roll Pelosi?
- Elections: Parties and Outcomes
- Moving Right Along
- "The" Facebook
- Congressional Elections: Strategy and Tactics
- Tentative roster of simulation roles
- Freshman Year
- Delaware Senate Seat a Contest in 2010?
- Where is John McCain now? *random*
- Clogging the Bipartisanship Drains
- Congress and the Stimulus
- Rahm to Oversee the Census?
- Again???
- Point of Reflection
- And the scandal continues...
- Money
- Interesting 2008 House Ads
- The other shoe?
- First Lady Steps Out of the White House
- Rahm Roasted
- Rahmbo insults children
-
▼
February
(48)
No comments:
Post a Comment