Gallup found self-identification in South Carolina at 42.8 percent Democratic and 42.3 percent Republican, for a Democratic advantage of one-half of 1 point. That makes the Palmetto State “competitive” according to Gallup’s system of classification.The moral is that party identification may be a lagging indicator. In South Carolina, many older white voters may still think of themselves as Democrats even though they often vote Republican. So in judging a state's leanings, look at election results, not just poll data.
That may indeed be the way people in South Carolina identify themselves by party, but it isn’t the way they vote. The state has two GOP Senators, a Republican governor and four Republican Congressmen, compared with two Democrats. The last Democratic nominee for president to carry the state was Jimmy Carter in 1976 (before most of the South had realigned), and in 2008, Republicans won large majorities in both chambers of the South Carolina Legislature.
This blog serves my Congress course (Claremont McKenna College Government 101) for the spring of 2024.
ABOUT THIS BLOG
I shall post videos, graphs, news stories, and other material there. We shall use some of this material in class, and you may review the rest at your convenience. You will all receive invitations to post to the blog. (Please let me know if you do not get such an invitation.) I encourage you to use the blog in these ways:
There are only two major limitations: no coarse language, and no derogatory comments about people at the Claremont Colleges.
To post questions or comments about the readings before we discuss them in class;
To follow up on class discussions with additional comments or questions.
To post relevant news items or videos.
There are only two major limitations: no coarse language, and no derogatory comments about people at the Claremont Colleges.
Search This Blog
Links
Tuesday, February 9, 2010
Limits of the Party Identification Variable
As you finish your papers, ponder the limits of party identification in polling. An individual's party affiliation is a good predictor of her or his vote, but statewide party identification sometimes produces anomalies. Stuart Rothenberg explains:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Links
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(110)
-
▼
February
(33)
- Now HERE Is a Committee Meeting!
- Nuclear Option?
- Joshua "Lemon" Lyman
- Family Guy
- Simulation Prep: Obama on NCLB
- CMC Sim Roles
- Scott Brown is planning to vote for the Democrat J...
- Helpful Table about President's Health Care Propos...
- Procedure
- Climate News
- Is the public option back from the dead?
- Legislation
- Simulation Roles
- Lobbying the Black Caucus, Legally
- Congressional Committees
- Reactions to Evan Bayh's Retirement
- How Harry Reid - and Democrats - Might Avoid Losing
- The sad decline of the Kennedy Family
- Hill Style and Leadership
- DeVore on Glenn Beck
- Limits of the Party Identification Variable
- Rahm
- Interesting article from FoxNews about the 2010 el...
- Campaign Finance and Home Style
- Tweets on Demon Sheep
- The "Naked Guy In A Truck"'s online strategy
- GOP is Recruiting Newcomers for the House
- Demographics and Congressional Elections
- Demonsheep Update
- Weirdest Ad of the Season (So Far)
- Demand Question Time
- Updated Information on Parties
- A late post, but the imagery in the Republican res...
-
▼
February
(33)
No comments:
Post a Comment