ABOUT THIS BLOG

I shall post videos, graphs, news stories, and other material there. We shall use some of this material in class, and you may review the rest at your convenience. You will all receive invitations to post to the blog. (Please let me know if you do not get such an invitation.) I encourage you to use the blog in these ways:
To post questions or comments about the readings before we discuss them in class;
To follow up on class discussions with additional comments or questions.
To post relevant news items or videos.

There are only two major limitations: no coarse language, and no derogatory comments about people at the Claremont Colleges.


Search This Blog

Monday, April 2, 2018

Congress and the Courts

The Ultimate Simulation:  The Stanford Prison Experiment








What happens when the court declares a law unconstitutional?

Statutory interpretation (Davidson 355-357): special ed cases


Checks on the Judiciary


  • Court-stipping (Davidson, 358-59) and Patchak v. Zinke


  • Impeachment:  most impeachment trials have involved judges


  • Court organization and administration


  • Constitutional amendments

  • US Courts of Appeal

    Supreme Court nominations

    • The modern era of SCOTUS fights started 50 years ago, with Fortas
    • March 16, 1970: As the Senate is considering he nomination of Judge G. Harrold Carswell to fill the Fortas seat, Senator Roman Hruska (R-NE) says in a TV interview, "Even if he [Carswell] were mediocre, there are a lot of mediocre judges and people and lawyers. They are entitled to a little representation, aren't they? We can't have all Brandeises and Frankfurters and Cardozos."



    No comments:

    Blog Archive