ABOUT THIS BLOG

I shall post videos, graphs, news stories, and other material there. We shall use some of this material in class, and you may review the rest at your convenience. You will all receive invitations to post to the blog. (Please let me know if you do not get such an invitation.) I encourage you to use the blog in these ways:
To post questions or comments about the readings before we discuss them in class;
To follow up on class discussions with additional comments or questions.
To post relevant news items or videos.

There are only two major limitations: no coarse language, and no derogatory comments about people at the Claremont Colleges.


Search This Blog

Wednesday, April 17, 2024

Domestic Policy: Drugs and Energy

For Monday, Davidson, ch. 15.

DRUGS

Senators Orrin Hatch, Harry Reid, Barbara Boxer, Charles Grassley, Don Nickles, and Massachusetts Governor Bill Weld in Traffic (2000)


The Early Days: WAR changes things

Civil War wounded warriors develop opiate addictions

1897 Sears Catalog

1885 ad:





War and Race

Legislation
Prohibition





Public Opinion

War on Drugs 1971

John Ehlichman:

You want to know what this was really all about?” he asked with the bluntness of a man who, after public disgrace and a stretch in federal prison, had little left to protect. “The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I’m saying? We knew we couldn’t make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders, raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did.”

The Controlled Substances Act of 1970

DEA 1973

The Len Bias Law of 1986

Rudy and Alfonse go undercover  in very convincing disguises

Drug Czar 1988

Crack 1989

The bag at 1 minute in, the response at 25 minutes



Monday, April 15, 2024

Economic Policy

 Wednesday readings will be on Sakai later today.

A few questions

  • Suppose your income places you in the 22% bracket.  How much of your income do you think is taxed at a rate of 22%?
  • Agree or disagree: large tax refunds are a good thing.
  • What tax rate applies to the top US federal income tax bracket?
  • How much do you think the top 1% of taxpayers by income account for in terms of share of total federal income taxes paid?

Constitutional Provisions


All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with amendments as on other Bills.”
— U.S. Constitution, Article I, section 7, clause 1


To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;
-- U.S. Constitution, Article I, section 8, clause 12

“No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law; and a regular Statement and Account of the Receipts and Expenditures of all public Money shall be published from time to time.”
— U.S. Constitution, Article I, section 9, clause 7


What follows would baffle a Martian.

Authorization (Davidson 398)
  • Reauthorization as a form of oversight
  • Lapsed authorizations:

Appropriation
  • Also a form of oversight 


"The Budget Process" and key documents:

Revenue Bills and RECONCILIATION (Davidson 408-409)

Revenues -- Where the money comes from:




Average Federal Tax Rates, by Income Group, 1979 to 2019

 

Average Federal Tax Rates, by Tax Source, 2019

Percent




Tax expenditures

Outlays -- Where the money goes:

Percentage of GDP












Sunday, April 14, 2024

Last Paper

 Answer one of the following:

  • The authors of Congress and Its Members finished writing the 19th edition in mid-2023. Pick any chapter in the book and write a three-page update. What events of the past year -- other than the election of a new speaker -- should materially change their analysis when they write the 20th edition?
  • Pick either Mike Johnson or Hakeem Jeffries.  What practical, politically feasible steps can he take to prevent a government shutdown this fall?  And why would he want to?
  • Read the famous Evans-Novak essay on LBJ's leadership of the Senate in the 1950s. (On Sakai).  To what extent could  "the Johnson system" succeed in today's Senate?  

You may also write on a relevant topic of your choice, subject to my approval.
  • Essays should be typed, double-spaced, and no more than three pages long. I will not read past the third page. 
  • Submit papers as Word documents, not pdfs or Google docs.
  • Cite your sources with endnotes in standard Turabian format. Endnote pages do not count against the page limit.
  • Misrepresenting AI-generated content as your own work is plagiarism and will result in severe consequences.
  • Watch your spelling, grammar, diction, and punctuation. Errors will count against you  -- especially errors that I have noted on previous papers.
  • Graduating seniors should return papers to the Sakai dropbox for this class by 11:59 PM, Wednesday, May 1.  All others should return papers by 11:59 PM, Friday, May 3.

Wednesday, April 10, 2024

Impeachment and Judiciary

For Monday, read Davidson ch. 14.  What domestic issues do you want to discuss on Wednesday of next week?

Trump Impeachment I


The J6 Committee




Court-packing  (Davidson 347-348).

A check on the court:  jurisdiction-stripping, or court-stripping (Davidson 344-345 -- a 2020 article)

Constitutional Amendments

Response to statutory (vs. constitutional) interpretation (Davidson p. 363)  Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act and ADA

Supreme Court Nominations (355-356)

Clarence Thomas:




In hearings, senators try to get judicial nominees on the record.  NOTE WHAT ALITO SAYS (START AT 18:45) ABOUT STARE DECISIS.





Merrick Garland and "the Biden Rule" 

Gorsuch and the nuclear option 

KBJ




Blue Slips and Senatorial Courtesy (Davidson, 357)


Monday, April 8, 2024

Impeachment

FOR WEDNESDAY, DAVIDSON, CH. 12. 

The Founders knew about the possibility of crooked presidents:


Article I, Section 3, Clause 7:

Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law.

Alexander Hamilton (in Federalist No. 72) 
An avaricious man, who might happen to fill the office, looking forward to … yield[ing] up the emoluments he enjoyed … might not scruple to have recourse to the most corrupt expedients.

An ambitious man, too, when … seated on the summit of his country’s honors, … would be … violently tempted to embrace a favorable conjuncture for attempting the prolongation of his power, at every personal hazard.

The Grounds

 There is no appeal.


The House
  • "Due process" does not apply.  
  • The Fifth Amendment says no person shall "be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." Impeachment merely removes a person from office.
The Senate

The Special Case of the President






Wednesday, April 3, 2024

Congress and the Executive IV



REVIEW: Legislation:  Executive Branch Organization and Laws on Reporting 

Actions in the Public Sphere: moves by members of Congress that catch the attention of alert publics.  Besides legislation (duh), the moves could include:


Key hearings


Monday, April 1, 2024

Congress and the Executive III: NAIL

 LARP v IRL

  • Compressed time
  • No dilatory tactics
  • No press, public, staff, House, or SCOTUS
  • Limited role of POTUS (see below)
  • Inherent limitations of simulation
  • But role-play is still powerful


NAIL: Nominations, Appropriations, Investigations, Legislation

Nominations 
Investigation and Oversight 
Legislation:  Executive Branch Organization and Laws on Reporting 

Blog Archive