Hello All!
First, a question from the reading. The chapter on Irregular Order explains, "Amendments will be voted on in the reverse order that they were proposed; this allows for all second-degree modifications to an amendment to be considered before the first-degree base amendment is voted on." (Straus, 220). Why is that? Am I missing something, or does that seem illogical?
Second, a fun little piece about Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-CA). During the National Defense Authorization Act Markup (in the House Armed Services Committee) last spring, Rep. Duncan proposed a "gotcha" amendment to require women to register for the draft. He meant to point at the ridiculousness of such a proposal and damage Democrats in the committee. Unfortunately, he forgot to withdraw the amendment before it went to vote. (See Straus, 220: "Even after an amendment has been proposed and debated, the amendment's sponsor may withdraw the amendment, as long as there has been no action taken on that amendment") It actually passed through the committee. Rep. Thornberry, the chair of the committee, had to do some serious behind the scenes work to make it go away later.
Article Here: http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/05/the-unlikely-birth-and-unseemly-death-of-an-amendment-to-draft-americas-women/483599/
C-SPAN Video Here: https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4591105/rep-duncan-hunter-amendment-requiring-women-register-military-draft
This blog serves my Congress course (Claremont McKenna College Government 101) for the spring of 2024.
ABOUT THIS BLOG
I shall post videos, graphs, news stories, and other material there. We shall use some of this material in class, and you may review the rest at your convenience. You will all receive invitations to post to the blog. (Please let me know if you do not get such an invitation.) I encourage you to use the blog in these ways:
There are only two major limitations: no coarse language, and no derogatory comments about people at the Claremont Colleges.
To post questions or comments about the readings before we discuss them in class;
To follow up on class discussions with additional comments or questions.
To post relevant news items or videos.
There are only two major limitations: no coarse language, and no derogatory comments about people at the Claremont Colleges.
Search This Blog
Links
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Links
Blog Archive
-
▼
2016
(128)
-
▼
September
(27)
- Ryan says House Reps will work with whomever wins ...
- Process IV
- "I guess I'm having an Aleppo moment"
- Simulation Roles, Fall 2016
- Process III
- Question and Amending Blunder re Women in the Draft
- Two More Dark Horses
- Dispensing Amendments, Points of Order
- Women of Congress - Sen. Warren takes on Wells Far...
- Simulation, Fall 2016
- Process II
- Second Paper, Fall 2016
- Dark Horses
- Legislative Process I
- Lobotomy on the Hill
- Leadership and LBJ
- Highlight from pg. 52 of Straus... Tom Delay was ...
- Questions I need a clarification from the reading...
- Party at Home and in Washington
- Politico: Trump expands House battleground map
- Christian Dominance in Congress and Younger Voter ...
- Public Service Announcement: Aleppo is in Syria an...
- Two Parties, Two Chambers, Two Lives
- First Paper, Fall 2016
- Double Lives In the Davidson reading Herrnson ...
- Video: Keepin' It RealClear: Senate Battlegrounds ...
- Congress: The Institution
-
▼
September
(27)
No comments:
Post a Comment