ABOUT THIS BLOG

I shall post videos, graphs, news stories, and other material there. We shall use some of this material in class, and you may review the rest at your convenience. You will all receive invitations to post to the blog. (Please let me know if you do not get such an invitation.) I encourage you to use the blog in these ways:
To post questions or comments about the readings before we discuss them in class;
To follow up on class discussions with additional comments or questions.
To post relevant news items or videos.

There are only two major limitations: no coarse language, and no derogatory comments about people at the Claremont Colleges.


Search This Blog

Sunday, April 12, 2026

Congress and the Judiciary

On Wednesday, we discuss scandal and the congressional disciplinary process. Will post a reading.  By coincidence, this week is the perfect time for this subject.

For next week, which domestic issues do you want to discuss?

Don 't forget your weekly writeups by the end of the week.

SCOTUS as a check on Congress

Congress as a check on the judiciary

Court-stripping (Davidson 355-356)

Amending the Constitution

  • 11th Amendment (1795): Overturned Chisholm v. Georgia (1793), which had allowed citizens of one state to sue another state in federal court, restricting federal judicial power over states.
  • 13th Amendment (1865): Abolished slavery, effectively overturning aspects of Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857), which had ruled that Congress could not prohibit slavery in territories.
  • 14th Amendment (1868): Granted citizenship to all born/naturalized in the US, directly overturning the Dred Scott ruling that African Americans could not be citizens.
  • 16th Amendment (1913): Authorized a federal income tax, overturning Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. (1895), which had declared a federal income tax unconstitutional.
  • 26th Amendment (1971): Lowered the voting age to 18, overturning part of Oregon v. Mitchell (1970), which held that Congress could set voting ages for federal elections but not state/local elections. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
  • Impeachment of Judges and the strange case of Alcee Hastings and his comeback De mortuis nil nisi bonum

     Supreme Court Nominations (361-367)

    Fortas roll call:  a filibuster precedent..


    In hearings, senators try to get judicial nominees on the record.  NOTE WHAT ALITO SAYS (START AT 18:45) ABOUT STARE DECISIS.






    KBJ




    Blue Slips and Senatorial Courtesy (Davidson, 368-370)

    Applies to US Attorneys:

    Tuesday, April 7, 2026

    Congress and Bureaucracy II

    Questions on the writeup?

    For Monday, Davidson ch. 12

    Today, no in-person student hour but available for Zoom after 2 pm  and tomorrow between 10 and 3. Please email me first.

    For Wed: will post article on censure, reprimand, and other issues surrounding misconduct.

    From last time:

    Congress "organizes" the executive:

    Subpoenas and Contempt of Congress (see Cassidy & RFK above)Impeachment (Davidson, 338)

    Article I, Section 3, Clause 7:

    Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law.

    Alexander Hamilton (in Federalist No. 72)

    An avaricious man, who might happen to fill the office, looking forward to … yield[ing] up the emoluments he enjoyed … might not scruple to have recourse to the most corrupt expedients.

    An ambitious man, too, when … seated on the summit of his country’s honors, … would be … violently tempted to embrace a favorable conjuncture for attempting the prolongation of his power, at every personal hazard.


    The Grounds
    There is no appeal.

    Andrew Johnson Impeachment -- see esp. Article Ten

    Impeachment v. Bill of Attainder

    Persons subject to impeachment

    (A separate process for disciplining members of Congress.  More a week from today)

    The list

    The Process
    The Special Case of the President


    At Harvard Law Review, Andrew Kent.Ethan J. Leib, and Jed Handelsman Shugerman have an article titled "Faithful Execution and Article II." From the abstract:
    Article II of the U.S. Constitution twice imposes a duty of “faithful execution” on the President, who must “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed,” and take an oath or affirmation to “faithfully execute the Office of President.
    Nixon

    Sunday, April 5, 2026

    Congress & Bureaucracy

    Constituents remember good constituent service:


    Weekly email writeups resume next week.  Focus on sim paper and peer evaluations (if you have not already submitted yours).

    What else do you want to discuss in the remainder of the course?

    LARP v IRL

    • Compressed time
    • No dilatory tactics
    • No press, public, staff, House, or SCOTUS
    • Limited role of POTUS (see below)
    • Inherent limitations of simulation
    • But role-play is still powerful


    NAIL: Nominations, Appropriations, Investigations, Legislation

    Nominations 

    • Oopsie -- but what can Cassidy do now?

    Appropriations
    Legislation: Executive Branch Organization and Laws on Reporting
    Next time:  Congress and DOGE

    Monday, March 23, 2026

    Simulation 2026

    The manual   For nearly 40 years, the customary professorial answer to most questions has been "You figure it out."


    The State of the Union

    Wednesday, March 11, 2026

    Congress and POTUS II

    End class early: Pallavi Raju (Kaine) will be here.

    Broader discussion of Congress and presidential power. The NYT article.

    Power to Persuade




    1. Republicans who lost primaries after opposing Trump U.S. House
    MemberStateYearReason / Context
    Liz CheneyWyoming2022Lost GOP primary after voting to impeach Trump and serving as vice-chair of the Jan. 6 committee.
    Jaime Herrera BeutlerWashington2022Voted to impeach Trump; eliminated in the 2022 “jungle” primary amid pro-Trump challenges.
    Tom RiceSouth Carolina2022Voted to impeach Trump; defeated by Trump-backed challenger Russell Fry.
    Peter MeijerMichigan2022Voted to impeach Trump; defeated in GOP primary by Trump-backed John Gibbs.
    Mark SanfordSouth Carolina2018Prominent Trump critic; lost primary to Trump-endorsed challenger Katie Arrington.
    Bob GoodVirginia2024Initially backed Ron DeSantis instead of Trump in the presidential primary and lost to Trump-endorsed challenger John McGuire. 

    2. Republicans who retired rather than run again amid conflict with Trump

    U.S. House

    MemberStateYearNotes
    Adam KinzingerIllinois2022One of two Republicans on the Jan. 6 committee; chose not to seek reelection.
    Anthony GonzalezOhio2022Voted to impeach Trump; announced retirement citing political toxicity and threats.
    Fred UptonMichigan2022Impeachment vote; retired after intense pro-Trump backlash.
    John KatkoNew York2022Impeachment vote; retired amid expected Trump-aligned primary challenge.
    Paul RyanWisconsin2018As Speaker, clashed with Trump on several issues and chose to retire rather than seek reelection.

    U.S. Senate

    MemberStateYearNotes
    Jeff FlakeArizona2018Frequent Trump critic; announced retirement saying the party was abandoning conservative principles.
    Bob CorkerTennessee2018Openly clashed with Trump and retired rather than run again.
    Ben SasseNebraska2022Long-time Trump critic; left the Senate to become president of the University of Florida.
    Thom TillisNorth Carolina2026Announced retirement after conflict with Trump and backlash from MAGA activists. 




    So we're going over Labor Day 1990 to look at the buildup in Bahrain, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia. There are two planes, one Senate, one House. I'm on the House plane obviously because I'm the House Deputy. But we have this mixture of young and older Members.

    Newt was on the plane but Bob Michel, Rostenkowski, [William] Broomfield, Dante Fascell, I think Dingell was on the plane. The delegation was headed by Gephardt, who at the time was majority leader. It's a 15-hour flight. We're going to stop in the Azores but we have dinner served on the plane and all the younger guys separate, go off, read books, go to bed. The older guys set up a card table at the front of the plane, proceed to play cards and drink all night long. I'm hanging out there, just listening to these guys.

    So the conversation is banter and this and that and then, "What are we going to do about this, we probably need a resolution. Foley and Gephardt already signaled that they're going to be against it." These guys just, as they did on so many issues, started talking back and forth about what they would do. When it came time for the vote we worked with Fascell, we worked with Rostenkowski, got a lot of these older guys to pass the resolution. It is a little-recognized fact that for the Second Gulf War resolution we got a lot more Democratic votes than we did the first one, despite having that big coalition. But that for me was almost the breaking point. It became increasingly rare to see that kind of cooperation across the aisle.



    AP report on Iran polls: "About half of registered voters — 53% — oppose U.S. military action against Iran, according to a new Quinnipiac Poll conducted over the weekend. Only 4 in 10 support it, and about 1 in 10 are uncertain. A new Ipsos poll also found more disapprove than approve of the strikes."


    War Power and Iran





    A moment when the Shadow Congress came out of the shadows and decided on war.



    Sunday, March 8, 2026

    Congress and POTUS

     Simulation details.  Will adjourn early for informal caucusing.  Jenna Milbrodt (Risch) will be here to advise.  Pallavi Raju (Kaine) will be here on Wed.  Harrison Steck is willing to play Trump.

    Reserved Kravis 161 for committee meetings during simulation.

    For Wednesday, let's have a broader discussion of Congress and presidential power.  Read this NYT article, bring questions and comments.

    Acronym time!

    The Struggle Over Presidential Authority: Article I and Article II

    Vetoes.  
    1— Strongly Support Passage
    2— Support Passage
    3— Do not Object to Passage
    4— No Position on Passage
    5— Oppose
    6— Strongly Oppose
    7— Secretary’s Veto Threat (single and multiple agency)
    8— Senior Advisor’s Veto Threat
    9— Presidential Veto Threat (285-286) and other warnings.
    Newt Gingrich, Lessons Learned the Hard Way (1998):
    We had not only failed to take into account the ability of the Senate to delay us and obstruct us, but we had much too cavalierly underrated the power of the President, even a President who had lost his legislative majority and was in a certain amount of trouble for other reasons. I am speaking of the power of the veto. Even if you pass something through both the House and the Senate, there is that presidential pen. How could we have forgotten that? For me especially it was inexcusable, because when I was Republican whip during the Bush Administration one of my duties had been precisely to help sustain presidential vetoes.
    Item Veto (287): Supreme Court struck it down in Clinton v. City of New York.

    Guess who was primarily responsible..

    Signing statements (291)
    Courts can also undo actions.  The case of DAPA -- US v. Texas



    Power to Persuade




    Tuesday, March 3, 2026

    Deals and the Shadow Congress

    Adjourn at 10:35 for preliminary meetings.  Harrison Steck-- Shaheen from 2025 -- will be present to provide guidance and answer questions.  From my presidency course, recruit a president and cabinet members.

    For your write-ups, explain how what you learn this week could guide your activity in the simulation.

    Questions on the assignment?

    For Monday, read Davidson, ch. 10.

    Expertise and acceptable sources of information.

    • "Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts"
    • Stipulated knowledge and CBO.
    • Knowledge levels of members.    
    Repeated interactions
    The Secret or Shadow Congress


    The final two-plus years of the Trump administration, for example, began with a government shutdown and featured two presidential impeachments. But they also saw the passage of a major conservation bill, a new trade agreement, significant criminal-justice reform, and several pandemic-relief packages.


    In 2022: The House overwhelmingly passed legislation to reform the beleaguered U.S. Postal Service. Days later the Senate approved, without a single vote in opposition, a bill proposed in response to the #MeToo movement that bans the use of forced arbitration in workplace sexual-harassment and assault cases. A bipartisan group of senators also announced an agreement on a long-stalled reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act, likely clearing the way for its passage.


    Update 

    One key is the presence of institutionalists (Cole and DeLauro -- and Thune!)

    Another key is privacy

     Think about the downsides of public meetings

    • Who actually attends (or watches) and takes notes?
    • How do members behave?  What kindsof questions do they ask?

    A third key is the range of potential beneficiaries:



     Image result for public lands forests map


    The vehicle



    Suspension of the rules gets around germaneness issues.

    More recent examples:

    Blog Archive